ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: We performed a shamcontrolled, randomized prospective trial in men with ED using an electrohydraulic shockwave device FDA cleared for connective tissue activation and improved blood flow. METHOD(S): This single-blind study was performed in men with ED naive to acoustic wave and shockwave therapy. Patients were randomized to treatment and assigned to active low intensity shockwave therapy (LiSWT) (4 Hz, 0.12 mJ/mm2) or sham treatment, 2:1. Arm 1 consisted of 3 treatments of 5000 shocks every 3 weeks. Arm 2 consisted of 5000, 3000, and 3000 shocks during weeks 1, 2, and 3, respectively, followed by an identical cycle of treatment 3 weeks later. Doppler ultrasound and grayscale imaging with a 15.4 MHz probe were performed under pharmacologic erection at weeks 20 and 32. Subjects completing sham treatment were unblinded and crossed over to the opposite arm for active treatment. Post-treatment end diastolic velocity (EDV) and peak systolic velocity (PSV) were measured, and visual grading scores were used to assess extent of hypoechoic regions in the corpora cavernosa. Data were analyzed by 2-way repeated measures ANOVA with Geisser-Greenhouse correction. Pairwise comparisons were performed to baseline used Dunnett's multiple comparison test. Missing data were imputed by "last observation carried forward". RESULT(S): Although powered for 60, recruitment was limited due to COVID and 36 subjects (22 active, 14 sham) were randomized. Sham treatments showed no significant changes in outcome measures. The number of subjects with improved visual grading scores in the proximal region was consistently higher in active LiSWT vs sham (Arm 1=88.9% vs. 11.1%;Arm 2=40.0% vs. 20.0%, respectively) with statistical significance in Arm 1 at weeks 20 (p=0.005) and 32 (p=0.001). Sham subjects rolled over to active LiSWT also had improved grayscale ratings (Arm 1=33.3% vs. 11.1%;Arm 2=40.0% vs. 20.0%). After LiSWT, greater numbers of patients had higher PSV, lower EDV, or no worsening of blood flow parameters relative to baseline. Decrease in EDV was statistically significant in active treatment Arm 2 at Week 32 (p=0.003). Mean IIEF-EF scores were nominally higher in subjects in active treatment who had improved visual grading scores vs those with no improvement. Adverse events were transient. CONCLUSION(S): Flaccid penile LiSWT appears to be safe and efficacious for treating ED based on statistically significant changes from baseline between sham and active treatments in primary outcome measures.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To describe the histopathological features of penile tissue of patients who recovered from symptomatic COVID-19 infection and subsequently developed severe erectile dysfunction (ED). MATERIALS AND METHODS: After providing informed consent, penile tissue was collected from patients undergoing surgery for inflatable penile prosthesis due to severe ED under an IRB approved protocol. Two specimens were obtained from men with a history of COVID-19 infection and two specimens were obtained from men with no history of infection (all men tested negative immediately before surgery). Tissue from COVID-19 (+) and COVID-19 (-) specimens were imaged with transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The tissue was analyzed for viral RNA using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and viral spike protein. Formalin-fixed paraffinembedded tissues were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and subjected to immunohistochemical analysis for endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase (eNOS) expression (marker of endothelial function). Endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) function was assessed ex vivo by determination of endothelial colony forming units from blood samples collected from the COVID-19 (+) and COVID (-) men with severe ED. RESULTS: TEM revealed extracellular viral particles ∼100 nm in diameter, with prominent peplomers (spikes), and electron-dense dots of the nucleocapsid inside the particles near penile vascular endothelial cells of the COVID-19 (+) patients. Notably, viral particles were not detected in tissue obtained from COVID-19 (-) men. COVID-19 RNA was detected in both the penis biopsy samples from men with a history of COVID, but not in the samples from COVID-19 (-) men. There were no significant differences in H&E staining between COVID-19 (+) and COVID-19 (-) men and viral spike protein was not detected. Immunohistochemistry showed decreased eNOS expression in the corpus cavernosum of COVID-19 (+) men compared to COVID-19 (-) men, consistent with endothelial dysfunction. COVID-19 spike protein-positive cells could not be detected by immunofluorescence despite positive COVID-19 PCR. EPC levels from the COVID-19 (+) men were 0 cell/well and 1.167 cell/well respectively compared to mean EPCs from 34 COVID-19 (-) men with severe ED (4.04 cells/well), suggesting impaired endothelial function. CONCLUSIONS: Our study is the first to demonstrate the presence of COVID-19 virus in the penis long after the initial infection in humans. Our study also suggests that widespread endothelial cell dysfunction from COVID-19 infection can contribute to resultant erectile dysfunction. Future studies will evaluate novel molecular mechanisms of how COVID-19 infection leads to ED. IMPACT STATEMENT: COVID-19 can linger in the penis long after initial infection and can contribute to erectile dysfunction.